Albert Hadnot Sr. v. Chad Adams

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 8, 2018
Docket09-18-00226-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Albert Hadnot Sr. v. Chad Adams (Albert Hadnot Sr. v. Chad Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Albert Hadnot Sr. v. Chad Adams, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00226-CV ____________________

ALBERT HADNOT SR., Appellant

V.

CHAD ADAMS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 1A District Court Jasper County, Texas Trial Cause No. 35836 ________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

Albert Hadnot Sr., appellant, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s

judgment. Appellant informed he Court of Appeals that he is indigent. On June 27,

2018, we provided Hadnot with a copy of the form approved by the Supreme Court

for purposes of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145 and directed Hadnot to return a

completed form with an inmate’s account statement. On July 23, 2018, appellant

filed an inmate’s account statement and a statement of inability to pay costs that was

prepared on the wrong form.

1 We abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for a

determination of appellant’s ability to afford payment of court costs under Rule 145

of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. The trial court may

require appellant to use the required form statement. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(b), (d).

Any motion to require appellant to pay costs or to require appellant to prove his

inability to afford costs must be filed in the trial court by the appropriate party in

accordance with Rule 145. See id. R. 145(f)(1)-(4). If necessary, the trial court shall

conduct a hearing and make appropriate orders. See id. R. 145(f)(5)-(7). Any

documents filed and orders signed pursuant to Rule 145 shall be forwarded to this

Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than August 28, 2018.

Alternatively, a party, the trial court clerk, or the court reporter may file a status

report informing this Court that additional time is needed for a determination under

Rule 145. In the absence of a request for additional time, this appeal will

automatically reinstate on August 28, 2018. Upon reinstatement, if an order

requiring appellant to pay costs has not been signed, appellant will be entitled to

proceed without payment of costs associated with this appeal. See id. R. 145(a).

ORDER ENTERED August 8, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Albert Hadnot Sr. v. Chad Adams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-hadnot-sr-v-chad-adams-texapp-2018.