Albert Hadnot Sr. v. Chad Adams
This text of Albert Hadnot Sr. v. Chad Adams (Albert Hadnot Sr. v. Chad Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-18-00226-CV ____________________
ALBERT HADNOT SR., Appellant
V.
CHAD ADAMS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 1A District Court Jasper County, Texas Trial Cause No. 35836 ________________________________________________________ _____________
ORDER
Albert Hadnot Sr., appellant, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s
judgment. Appellant informed he Court of Appeals that he is indigent. On June 27,
2018, we provided Hadnot with a copy of the form approved by the Supreme Court
for purposes of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145 and directed Hadnot to return a
completed form with an inmate’s account statement. On July 23, 2018, appellant
filed an inmate’s account statement and a statement of inability to pay costs that was
prepared on the wrong form.
1 We abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for a
determination of appellant’s ability to afford payment of court costs under Rule 145
of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. The trial court may
require appellant to use the required form statement. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(b), (d).
Any motion to require appellant to pay costs or to require appellant to prove his
inability to afford costs must be filed in the trial court by the appropriate party in
accordance with Rule 145. See id. R. 145(f)(1)-(4). If necessary, the trial court shall
conduct a hearing and make appropriate orders. See id. R. 145(f)(5)-(7). Any
documents filed and orders signed pursuant to Rule 145 shall be forwarded to this
Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than August 28, 2018.
Alternatively, a party, the trial court clerk, or the court reporter may file a status
report informing this Court that additional time is needed for a determination under
Rule 145. In the absence of a request for additional time, this appeal will
automatically reinstate on August 28, 2018. Upon reinstatement, if an order
requiring appellant to pay costs has not been signed, appellant will be entitled to
proceed without payment of costs associated with this appeal. See id. R. 145(a).
ORDER ENTERED August 8, 2018.
PER CURIAM
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Albert Hadnot Sr. v. Chad Adams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-hadnot-sr-v-chad-adams-texapp-2018.