Albert Fadem Trust v. Duke Energy Corp.
This text of 113 F. App'x 427 (Albert Fadem Trust v. Duke Energy Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
We have considered all of appellants’ arguments and, substantially for the reasons explained by the District Court in its Memorandum Order, entered October 17, 2003, we hold that each is without merit. We also find that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ request for leave to amend where plaintiffs failed to file a proper motion to amend or a proposed amendment and where they have already had one opportunity to amend. See McLaughlin v. Anderson, 962 F.2d 187, 195 (2d Cir.1992).
Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
113 F. App'x 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-fadem-trust-v-duke-energy-corp-ca2-2004.