Albert F. Maurer Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Albert F. Maurer Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 449

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Albert F. Maurer Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 Cust. Ct. 284 →

United States Customs Court·Decided May 31, 1956·No. No. 59962; protests 204013-K and 206101-K (Philadelphia)·Published

Opinion

[450]*450Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of battery plates in the form of antimonial lead scrap, of which nonferrous metal is the component material in chief value, which are secondhand or waste or refuse, or are obsolete, defective, or damaged, and which are fit only to be remanu-factured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, as amended by Public Law 535, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[450]*450Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of battery plates in the form of antimonial lead scrap, of which nonferrous metal is the component material in chief value, which are secondhand or waste or refuse, or are obsolete, defective, or damaged, and which are fit only to be remanu-factured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, as amended by Public Law 535, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Albert F. Maurer Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 449 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

36 Cust. Ct. 449 (Albert F. Maurer Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.