Albert F. Jordan, Superintendent of Insurance of the District of Columbia v. Herbert M. Pilzer

D.C. Circuit

Albert F. Jordan, Superintendent of Insurance of the District of Columbia v. Herbert M. Pilzer

234 F.2d 41, 98 U.S. App. D.C. 220, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3663

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 23, 1956·No. 12904_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee sought and the District Court granted an injunction to restrain the Superintendent of Insurance from refusing to renew appellee’s applications for a broker’s and policywriting agent’s license for fire, casualty and surety business and for a solicitor’s license. This appeal followed. The District Court concluded that the Superintendent’s ordei *42 denying appellee’s applications lacked a reasonable basis or- support in the evidence. Accordingly he directed the Superintendent to issue the licenses applied for. This appeal had been taken and the District’s brief had been filed before our opinion in No. 12486—Atlantic Insurance Co. v. Jordan, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 184, 229 F.2d 758 (P.C.Cir.1955). That case, in principle, is controlling here, and accordingly the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellee sought and the District Court granted an injunction to restrain the Superintendent of Insurance from refusing to renew appellee’s applications for a broker’s and policywriting agent’s license for fire, casualty and surety business and for a solicitor’s license. This appeal followed. The District Court concluded that the Superintendent’s ordei *42 denying appellee’s applications lacked a reasonable basis or- support in the evidence. Accordingly he directed the Superintendent to issue the licenses applied for. This appeal had been taken and the District’s brief had been filed before our opinion in No. 12486—Atlantic Insurance Co. v. Jordan, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 184, 229 F.2d 758 (P.C.Cir.1955). That case, in principle, is controlling here, and accordingly the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Albert F. Jordan, Superintendent of Insurance of the District of Columbia v. Herbert M. Pilzer, 234 F.2d 41, 98 U.S. App. D.C. 220, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3663 (D.C. Cir. 1956).

Pincite

234 F.2d 41 (Albert F. Jordan, Superintendent of Insurance of the District of Columbia v. Herbert M. Pilzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related