Albert, D. v. Sheeley's Drug Store
This text of Albert, D. v. Sheeley's Drug Store (Albert, D. v. Sheeley's Drug Store) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
M.D. Appeal Dkt. 5 MAP 2021
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
DALE E. ALBERT INDIVIDUALLY AND AS : No. 416 MAL 2020 THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE : OF CODY M. ALBERT, DECEASED, : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal Petitioner : from the Order of the Superior Court : : v. : : : SHEELEY'S DRUG STORE, INC. AND : ZACHARY ROSS, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:
(1) Did the Superior Court err in finding that Plaintiff's claim was barred under the in pari delicto doctrine, where there is no evidence in the record that the decedent participated in the scheme to procure the prescription drugs illegally?
(2) Did the Superior Court improperly expand the doctrine of in pari delicto to preclude Plaintiff's recovery simply because Decedent was in possession of a controlled substance that was not his?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Albert, D. v. Sheeley's Drug Store, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-d-v-sheeleys-drug-store-pa-2021.