Albert Charles Burgess, Jr. v. J.H. Griffin, Superintendent of McCain Prison Unit and the State of North Carolina

743 F.2d 1064, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18401
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 20, 1984
Docket84-6287
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 743 F.2d 1064 (Albert Charles Burgess, Jr. v. J.H. Griffin, Superintendent of McCain Prison Unit and the State of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Albert Charles Burgess, Jr. v. J.H. Griffin, Superintendent of McCain Prison Unit and the State of North Carolina, 743 F.2d 1064, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18401 (4th Cir. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The State of North Carolina appeals from the district court’s grant of Albert Burgess’s petition for habeas corpus relief. In January 1979, Albert Burgess, expressly waiving a defective indictment, pled guilty in North Carolina Superior Court to taking indecent liberties with children. After several appearances at sentencing hearings but before sentencing, Burgess fled to South Carolina. After his capture, he was again indicted for taking indecent liberties with children, this time on twenty-seven different counts, despite the state’s earlier assurance that the initial charge to which he pled guilty would cover these counts. The state superior court that heard the second prosecution struck the first guilty plea sua sponte and accepted a second plea of guilty. Burgess was then sentenced to two consecutive ten year terms. The maximum sentence Burgess could have received following his initial prosecution was ten years.

In a thorough and well reasoned opinion, the district court concluded that Burgess did not waive his right to assert double jeopardy by pleading guilty after the second prosecution and that the state violated Burgess’s fifth amendment right against double jeopardy when it again brought charges against him after he had fled the jurisdiction.

After careful consideration of the record, the briefs, and the arguments of counsel, we find ourselves in complete agreement with the district court. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of the district court’s opinion. Burgess v. Griffin, 585 F.Supp. 1564 (W.D.N.C.1984).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
743 F.2d 1064, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 18401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-charles-burgess-jr-v-jh-griffin-superintendent-of-mccain-ca4-1984.