Albert B. Ashforth, Inc. v. Stern

159 N.Y.S. 1097

This text of 159 N.Y.S. 1097 (Albert B. Ashforth, Inc. v. Stern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Albert B. Ashforth, Inc. v. Stern, 159 N.Y.S. 1097 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Respondent concedes that the judgment was by inadvertence entered for §250, and should be reduced to S225. It is modified accordingly, and, as modified, affirmed, with appropriate costs in the court below, and, as modified, affirmed, with $25 costs to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 N.Y.S. 1097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-b-ashforth-inc-v-stern-nyappterm-1916.