Albert B. Ashforth, Inc. v. Equity Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Albert B. Ashforth, Inc. v. Equity Corp.

30 A.D.2d 950, 294 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3215

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 10, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 950 (Albert B. Ashforth, Inc. v. Equity Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Albert B. Ashforth, Inc. v. Equity Corp., 30 A.D.2d 950, 294 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered June 28,1968, granting motion of defendant The Equity Corporation for a protective order, unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, and the motion denied, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellant. The examination is to proceed pursuant to plaintiffs’ notice thereof. The person sought to be deposed is and was the president and chairman of the board of the Equity Corporation. He was present when the offer of the purchaser procured by plaintiffs was acted on. The officer produced by the defendant was on vacation during the period the proposal was under consideration by the said board of directors. Concur — Stevens, J. P., Tilzer, McGivern, McNally and Macken, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered June 28,1968, granting motion of defendant The Equity Corporation for a protective order, unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, and the motion denied, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellant. The examination is to proceed pursuant to plaintiffs’ notice thereof. The person sought to be deposed is and was the president and chairman of the board of the Equity Corporation. He was present when the offer of the purchaser procured by plaintiffs was acted on. The officer produced by the defendant was on vacation during the period the proposal was under consideration by the said board of directors. Concur — Stevens, J. P., Tilzer, McGivern, McNally and Macken, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 950, 294 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-b-ashforth-inc-v-equity-corp-nyappdiv-1968.