Albert Abdalla v. United States

323 F.2d 365
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 25, 1963
Docket19993_1
StatusPublished

This text of 323 F.2d 365 (Albert Abdalla v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Albert Abdalla v. United States, 323 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Abdalla, seeks a reversal of his conviction and sentence entered pursuant to a plea of guilty because of the following: (1) his guilty plea was not entered voluntarily; (2) the indictment was fatally defective; (3) the trial court erred in overruling motions challenging the organization and composition of the Grand Jury; and (4) various other contentions as to the conduct of the proceedings.

We have carefully reviewed the record and all of the contentions of the appellant, Abdalla. Throughout the proceedings he was represented by counsel who apparently gave the case proper attention and served Abdalla well. We find no merit in any of the alleged errors, but on the contrary conclude from a review of the record that his various contentions and specifications of error are wholly without merit. See Warren v. United States, 5 Cir. 1956, 232 F.2d 629; Alexander v. United States, 5 Cir., 1961, 290 F.2d 252; and Burns v. United States, 5 Cir. 1963, 321 F.2d 269.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis William Warren v. United States
232 F.2d 629 (Fifth Circuit, 1956)
Raymond G. Alexander v. United States
290 F.2d 252 (Fifth Circuit, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
323 F.2d 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-abdalla-v-united-states-ca5-1963.