Albert Abdalla v. United States
This text of 323 F.2d 365 (Albert Abdalla v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Abdalla, seeks a reversal of his conviction and sentence entered pursuant to a plea of guilty because of the following: (1) his guilty plea was not entered voluntarily; (2) the indictment was fatally defective; (3) the trial court erred in overruling motions challenging the organization and composition of the Grand Jury; and (4) various other contentions as to the conduct of the proceedings.
We have carefully reviewed the record and all of the contentions of the appellant, Abdalla. Throughout the proceedings he was represented by counsel who apparently gave the case proper attention and served Abdalla well. We find no merit in any of the alleged errors, but on the contrary conclude from a review of the record that his various contentions and specifications of error are wholly without merit. See Warren v. United States, 5 Cir. 1956, 232 F.2d 629; Alexander v. United States, 5 Cir., 1961, 290 F.2d 252; and Burns v. United States, 5 Cir. 1963, 321 F.2d 269.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
323 F.2d 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-abdalla-v-united-states-ca5-1963.