Albert A. Arvidson v. Reynolds Metals Company, a Corporation, W. J. Whiteaker v. Reynolds Metals Company, a Corporation
Opinion
The above cases coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the findings of fact of the district court were not clearly erroneous, and that the judgments are sustained by substantial evidence, and that the conclusions of law of the district court were correctly drawn,
The judgment is affirmed, upon the opinion of the district court in W.D. Wash.1954, 125 F.Supp. 481;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
236 F.2d 224 (Albert A. Arvidson v. Reynolds Metals Company, a Corporation, W. J. Whiteaker v. Reynolds Metals Company, a Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.