Albers v. Wal-Mart Stores

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 3, 1997·No. 96-31306·Unpublished

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

96-31306 Summary Calendar __________________

MICHAEL ALBERS,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WAL-MART STORES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (95-CV-4278-D) _________________________________________________ June 30, 1997 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Wal-Mart challenges the judgment entered on a verdict against

them in this slip and fall case on grounds that the evidence does

not support the verdict. Our review of the record persuades us

that the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. The

judgment is therefore

AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albers v. Wal-Mart Stores, (5th Cir. 1997).

Albers v. Wal-Mart Stores (Albers v. Wal-Mart Stores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.