Albers v. Wal-Mart Stores
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_________________
96-31306 Summary Calendar __________________
MICHAEL ALBERS,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (95-CV-4278-D) _________________________________________________ June 30, 1997 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Wal-Mart challenges the judgment entered on a verdict against
them in this slip and fall case on grounds that the evidence does
not support the verdict. Our review of the record persuades us
that the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict. The
judgment is therefore
AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Albers v. Wal-Mart Stores (Albers v. Wal-Mart Stores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.