Albers v. Clymer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Albers v. Clymer

444 S.W.3d 531, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 917, 2014 WL 4198032

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 26, 2014·No. No. ED 100670·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Deborah Clymer (Clymer) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of Mary Ann Albers, Personal Representative of the Estate of Virginia Ann Delahunt, and against Clymer in the amount of $114,703.25. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Deborah Clymer (Clymer) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of Mary Ann Albers, Personal Representative of the Estate of Virginia Ann Delahunt, and against Clymer in the amount of $114,703.25. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Albers v. Clymer, 444 S.W.3d 531, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 917, 2014 WL 4198032 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

444 S.W.3d 531 (Albers v. Clymer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.