Albergo v. Bowers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Albergo v. Bowers

61 A.D.2d 895, 404 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14874

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 61 A.D.2d 895 (Albergo v. Bowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Albergo v. Bowers, 61 A.D.2d 895, 404 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review the determination of the respondent Frank C. Bowers, Jr., a Judge of the County Court, Putnam County, in denying petitioner’s application for a pistol permit, and for a direction that petitioner be issued the pistol permit. Application denied, determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed, on the merits, without costs or disbursements (cf. Matter of Hunt v Rubin, 52 AD2d 955). We note that this proceeding was originally brought at Special Term where the Attorney-General argued that it should properly have been brought in this court, precisely the opposite of the position now taken by him. Margett, J. P., Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review the determination of the respondent Frank C. Bowers, Jr., a Judge of the County Court, Putnam County, in denying petitioner’s application for a pistol permit, and for a direction that petitioner be issued the pistol permit. Application denied, determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed, on the merits, without costs or disbursements (cf. Matter of Hunt v Rubin, 52 AD2d 955). We note that this proceeding was originally brought at Special Term where the Attorney-General argued that it should properly have been brought in this court, precisely the opposite of the position now taken by him. Margett, J. P., Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 895, 404 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albergo-v-bowers-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack