Alberelli v. Manning

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Alberelli v. Manning

185 Misc. 280, 56 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2054

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 27, 1945·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum Per Curiam.

The evidence fully establishes that the moneys were loaned to defendant in contemplation and expectation of marriage. The action is barred and comes within sections 61-a and 61-b of article 2-A of the Civil Practice Act.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.

Hammer and Eder, JJ., concur; Shientag, J., dissents.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum Per Curiam.

The evidence fully establishes that the moneys were loaned to defendant in contemplation and expectation of marriage. The action is barred and comes within sections 61-a and 61-b of article 2-A of the Civil Practice Act.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.

Hammer and Eder, JJ., concur; Shientag, J., dissents.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Alberelli v. Manning, 185 Misc. 280, 56 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2054 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).

Pincite

185 Misc. 280 (Alberelli v. Manning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related