Alberelli v. Manning
This text of 185 Misc. 280 (Alberelli v. Manning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence fully establishes that the moneys were loaned to defendant in contemplation and expectation of marriage. The action is barred and comes within sections 61-a and 61-b of article 2-A of the Civil Practice Act.
The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.
Hammer and Eder, JJ., concur; Shientag, J., dissents.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 Misc. 280, 56 N.Y.S.2d 493, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alberelli-v-manning-nyappterm-1945.