Alber v. Alber
720 N.W.2d 291, 476 Mich. 864
This text of 720 N.W.2d 291 (Alber v. Alber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Alber v. Alber, 720 N.W.2d 291, 476 Mich. 864 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Barbara Mae ALBER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Craig Allen ALBER, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for costs and attorney fees is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
720 N.W.2d 291, 476 Mich. 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alber-v-alber-mich-2006.