Albea v. State

150 S.E. 434, 40 Ga. App. 503, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 608
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 12, 1929·No. 19967·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. “The failure of the court to instruct the jury upon the effect of proof of the good character of the defendant was not error, in the absence of a proper written request. Brantley v. State, 154 Ga. 80 (4) (113 S. E. 200).” O’Bryant v. State, 37 Ga. App. 827 (2) (142 S. E. 306).

2. The verdict has the approval of the trial judge, and we can not say that there is no evidence to support it. “Applications for new trials on the ground that the verdict of the jury is contrary to evidence are addressed to a sound legal discretion to be exercised by the trial judges. When this discretion has been exercised and the motion for a new trial overruled, this court will not interfere when there is any evidence which would justify the jury in reaching the conclusion which is set forth in the verdict.” Rogers v. State, 101 Ga. 561 (28 S. E. 978).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albea v. State, 150 S.E. 434, 40 Ga. App. 503, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 608 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

150 S.E. 434 (Albea v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. State
159 S.E. 138 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Cumby v. State
158 S.E. 773 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)