Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Albany Discount Corp. v. Mohawk National Bank of Schenectady

Albany Discount Corp. v. Mohawk National Bank of Schenectady

30 A.D.2d 919, 292 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3313
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 8, 1968·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument granted, memorandum decision dated May 27, 1968 (30 A D 2d 623) recalled and, upon reargument, order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (54 Misc 2d 238 Grangle, J.) entered September 21, 1967 in Albany County, affirmed, without costs. The lucid opinion at Special Term correctly determined the basic questions of law arising upon the factual contentions advanced by defendant (54 Misc 2d 238; see, also, Matter of Vinarsky, 287 F. Supp. 446; U. S. Dist. Ct., N. D. N. Y., Mar. 29, 1968, Foley, J.; contra, Recchio v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., 55 Misc 2d 788); but we modified the Special Term order, holding that “In view of the existence of factual questions, summary judgment should not have been granted to respondent” (30 A D 2d 623). These factual questions have now been resolved pursuant to stipulation of the parties dated June 14, 1968. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Gabrielli, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albany Discount Corp. v. Mohawk National Bank of Schenectady, 30 A.D.2d 919, 292 N.Y.S.2d 300, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3313 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

30 A.D.2d 919 (Albany Discount Corp. v. Mohawk National Bank of Schenectady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Vinarsky
287 F. Supp. 446 (N.D. New York, 1968)
Albany Discount Corp. v. Mohawk National Bank
54 Misc. 2d 238 (New York Supreme Court, 1967)
Recchio v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.
55 Misc. 2d 788 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)