Albany Brewing Co. v. Barckley

70 A.D. 260, 2 Liquor Tax Rep. 649, 74 N.Y.S. 901
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1902·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.:

This judgment must be reversed as beyond the power of the County Court to grant. The jurisdiction of that court is prescribed by statute. There is no statutory authority for a trial by the County Court of the issue which was here tried between the plaintiff and the defendant Smith, nor for the granting of any judgment upon such an issue. This want of jurisdiction is not cured by any proceeding on the part of the defendant Smith, as - a defendant is powerless, even by consent, to confer jurisdiction of the subject-matter in litigation upon a court of limited jurisdiction. It becomes unnecessary, therefore, to examine the other objections discussed upon the briefs of counsel. The judgment must be reversed and a new. trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event of the action.

All concurred.

Judgment reversed on the law and facts and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albany Brewing Co. v. Barckley, 70 A.D. 260, 2 Liquor Tax Rep. 649, 74 N.Y.S. 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

70 A.D. 260 (Albany Brewing Co. v. Barckley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lopiano v. Telephone Co.
139 Misc. 831 (New York Supreme Court, 1931)
Ertrachter v. Locust Building Co.
102 Misc. 368 (New York County Courts, 1918)
Tierney v. Helvetia Swiss Fire Insurance
126 A.D. 446 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)