Albano v. Unemployment Appeals Commission
This text of 701 So. 2d 911 (Albano v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The referee’s determination that appellant’s illness required her to leave her employment was a finding of fact. The Unemployment Appeals Commission may only reverse those findings “where there is no competent, substantial evidence in the record to support the appeals referee’s decision.” Campeanu v. Florida Unemployment App. Comm’n, 629 So.2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). We hold that the record contains sufficient competent, substantial evidence to support the referee’s decision and that appellant is entitled to benefits as ordered by the referee. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Unemployment Appeals Commission and remand for further proceedings.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
701 So. 2d 911, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13359, 1997 WL 740684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albano-v-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-1997.