Albanese v. Social Security
This text of Albanese v. Social Security (Albanese v. Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 00-1368
JO-ANN ALBANESE,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
[Hon. Mary M. Lisi, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Lynch and Lipez, Circuit Judges.
Jo-Ann Albanese on brief pro se. Margaret E. Curran, United States Attorney, Robin E. Feder, Assistant United States Attorney, and Wayne G. Lewis, Assistant Regional Counsel, on brief for appellee.
December 27, 2000 Per Curiam. After carefully considering the briefs
and record on appeal, we affirm the Commissioner’s decision
for substantially the reasons stated in the opinions below.
The claimant did not provide medical evidence
documenting that she had a disabling impairment prior to May
27, 1998. 20 C.F.R. § 416.908. She may have suffered a
serious impairment, but that is not enough to establish
entitlement to disability benefits. 20 C.F.R. §§ 416.905,
416.912.
Affirmed. Loc. R. 27(c).
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Albanese v. Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albanese-v-social-security-ca1-2000.