Alba v. Pastoressa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alba v. Pastoressa

16 A.D.3d 243, 791 N.Y.S.2d 547, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2997

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.3d 243 (Alba v. Pastoressa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alba v. Pastoressa, 16 A.D.3d 243, 791 N.Y.S.2d 547, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2997 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered on or about March 30, 2004, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiffs were hit by a car operated by defendant estate’s decedent and owned by the other defendants, denied defendants’ motion to vacate their defaults in appearing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants have met neither requirement for vacating their default. As an excuse for the decedent’s failure to answer the complaint, defendants assert that he was already ill and dying in August 1999 when plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment was granted; however, the relevant point in time is almost a year earlier, in September 1998, when the decedent was served. Concerning the other defendants, who were also served in September 1998, not even a semblance of an excuse is offered for their defaults. We also note defendants’ long delay in moving to vacate their defaults after an executor for the decedent’s estate was appointed (see Gerlin v Homann Trucking, 303 AD2d 262 [2003]). We also find that defendants have failed to present a meritorious defense. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Marlow, Ellerin, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered on or about March 30, 2004, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiffs were hit by a car operated by defendant estate’s decedent and owned by the other defendants, denied defendants’ motion to vacate their defaults in appearing, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants have met neither requirement for vacating their default. As an excuse for the decedent’s failure to answer the complaint, defendants assert that he was already ill and dying in August 1999 when plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment was granted; however, the relevant point in time is almost a year earlier, in September 1998, when the decedent was served. Concerning the other defendants, who were also served in September 1998, not even a semblance of an excuse is offered for their defaults. We also note defendants’ long delay in moving to vacate their defaults after an executor for the decedent’s estate was appointed (see Gerlin v Homann Trucking, 303 AD2d 262 [2003]). We also find that defendants have failed to present a meritorious defense. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Marlow, Ellerin, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.3d 243, 791 N.Y.S.2d 547, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alba-v-pastoressa-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack