Alatalo v. State

2 So. 3d 1064, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 883
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 4, 2009·No. No. 3D07-2779·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As the defendant did not make a cognizable claim under Florida Rule of Criminal [1065]*1065Procedure 3.170(Z), we affirm the trial court’s ruling.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alatalo v. State, 2 So. 3d 1064, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 883 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

2 So. 3d 1064 (Alatalo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.