Alatalo v. State
2 So. 3d 1064, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 883
Opinion
As the defendant did not make a cognizable claim under Florida Rule of Criminal [1065]*1065Procedure 3.170(Z), we affirm the trial court’s ruling.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alatalo v. State, 2 So. 3d 1064, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 883 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
2 So. 3d 1064 (Alatalo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.