Alaska Wilderness League v. Salazar

Ninth Circuit

Alaska Wilderness League v. Salazar

571 F.3d 859, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15124

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 30, 2009

Docket07-71457, 07-71989, 07-72183

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 571 F.3d 859 (Alaska Wilderness League v. Salazar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alaska Wilderness League v. Salazar, 571 F.3d 859, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15124 (9th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Petitioners in this case challenge the Minerals Management Service’s (“MMS”) approval of Respondent-Intervenor Shell Offshore Inc.’s (“Shell”) 2007-2009 Beaufort Sea Plan of Exploration (“EP”). On May 5, 2009, however, Shell withdrew its EP, and the MMS subsequently rescinded its prior approval of that EP. The MMS characterized the EP as “null and void” and declared that it “will not consider nor approve any exploratory drilling activity under this EP.”

The MMS’s rescission of its approval of the EP, which was the agency action at issue in this appeal, renders Petitioners’ challenge moot. Accordingly, Shell’s unopposed “Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Moot” is GRANTED.

This appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT. The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal. A certified copy of this order shall serve as the mandate of this court.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI