Alaska Wilderness League v. Kempthorne

Ninth Circuit

Alaska Wilderness League v. Kempthorne

559 F.3d 916, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5742, 2009 WL 605896

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 6, 2009·No. 07-71457, 07-71989, 07-72183·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The opinion and dissent filed on November 20, 2008, and published at 548 F.3d 815 (9th Cir.2008), are hereby vacated and withdrawn. Respondents’ petition for re *917 hearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied as moot. All pending motions to file amicus briefs in support of rehearing are likewise denied as moot. The opinion vacated and withdrawn will be replaced by a new opinion. Our denial of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc is made without prejudice to any party who may wish to file a petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc with regard to the new opinion.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The opinion and dissent filed on November 20, 2008, and published at 548 F.3d 815 (9th Cir.2008), are hereby vacated and withdrawn. Respondents’ petition for re *917 hearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied as moot. All pending motions to file amicus briefs in support of rehearing are likewise denied as moot. The opinion vacated and withdrawn will be replaced by a new opinion. Our denial of the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc is made without prejudice to any party who may wish to file a petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc with regard to the new opinion.

SO ORDERED.

Alaska Wilderness League v. Kempthorne, 559 F.3d 916, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5742, 2009 WL 605896 (9th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

559 F.3d 916 (Alaska Wilderness League v. Kempthorne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related