Alas Ex Rel. De Rosales v. Brentwood Health Center
This text of 121 A.D.3d 822 (Alas Ex Rel. De Rosales v. Brentwood Health Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*823 In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Rebolini, J.), dated October 2, 2012, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to serve a timely notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e and denied her cross motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs failure to include a proposed notice of claim with the papers in support of her cross motion was a sufficient basis for denying her cross motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim (see General Municipal Law § 50-e [7]; Matter of Scott v Huntington Union Free School Dist., 29 AD3d 1010, 1010 [2006]). Moreover, the plaintiff failed to demonstrate grounds for granting leave to serve a late notice of claim (see Rowe v Nassau Health Care Corp., 57 AD3d 961, 963 [2008]; Williams v Nassau County Med. Ctr., 13 AD3d 363, 364 [2004], affd 6 NY3d 531 [2006]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to serve a timely notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e, and properly denied the plaintiffs cross motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 A.D.3d 822, 993 N.Y.S.2d 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alas-ex-rel-de-rosales-v-brentwood-health-center-nyappdiv-2014.