Alarcon v. Coca-Cola Enterprises

699 N.W.2d 757, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 422, 2005 WL 1774307
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided July 19, 2005·No. No. A05-783·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed March 23, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no [758] precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alarcon v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, 699 N.W.2d 757, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 422, 2005 WL 1774307 (Mich. 2005).

699 N.W.2d 757 (Alarcon v. Coca-Cola Enterprises) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)