Alarcon v. Alarcon

135 So. 3d 542, 2014 WL 1382728, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5220
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 2014·No. No. 2D13-1476·Published

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

In this postdissolution proceeding, Valentin Alarcon, Jr. (the Former Husband), appeals a supplemental final judgment that modifies timesharing and child support and determines entitlement to attorney’s fees in favor of Alexis E. Alarcon (the Former Wife). We affirm without discussion on the timesharing and child support. However, we dismiss the appeal as premature regarding the issue of attorney’s fees.

Because the trial court’s ruling only addressed entitlement to fees and not the amount that the Former Husband is obligated to pay, that portion of the supplemental judgment is not ripe for appeal. See Shadwick v. Shadwick, 132 So.3d 915 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Zuberer v. Zuberer, 28 So.3d 993, 993-94 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). Thus, we dismiss the appeal in part as premature with respect to the attorney’s fees portion of the supplemental final judgment.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.

BLACK and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alarcon v. Alarcon, 135 So. 3d 542, 2014 WL 1382728, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5220 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

135 So. 3d 542 (Alarcon v. Alarcon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zuberer v. Zuberer
28 So. 3d 993 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Shadwick v. Shadwick
132 So. 3d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)