Alarcon v. Alarcon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Alarcon v. Alarcon

135 So. 3d 542, 2014 WL 1382728, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5220

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 9, 2014

DocketNo. 2D13-1476

StatusPublished

This text of 135 So. 3d 542 (Alarcon v. Alarcon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alarcon v. Alarcon, 135 So. 3d 542, 2014 WL 1382728, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5220 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

In this postdissolution proceeding, Valentin Alarcon, Jr. (the Former Husband), appeals a supplemental final judgment that modifies timesharing and child support and determines entitlement to attorney’s fees in favor of Alexis E. Alarcon (the Former Wife). We affirm without discussion on the timesharing and child support. However, we dismiss the appeal as premature regarding the issue of attorney’s fees.

Because the trial court’s ruling only addressed entitlement to fees and not the amount that the Former Husband is obligated to pay, that portion of the supplemental judgment is not ripe for appeal. See Shadwick v. Shadwick, 132 So.3d 915 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Zuberer v. Zuberer, 28 So.3d 993, 993-94 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). Thus, we dismiss the appeal in part as premature with respect to the attorney’s fees portion of the supplemental final judgment.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.

BLACK and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI