Alape v. State
855 So. 2d 155, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12387, 2003 WL 21976142
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 20, 2003
DocketNo. 4D03-2446
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 855 So. 2d 155 (Alape v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Alape v. State, 855 So. 2d 155, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12387, 2003 WL 21976142 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
Opinion
Keith Alape seeks review of an order that denied his rule 3.850 motion without prejudice to permit a proper filing. We find appellant’s sworn motion(s) and memorandum of law to state a legally sufficient claim that his plea was unlawfully induced. We reverse and remand for the trial court to consider the claim on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
LaFleur v. State
855 So. 2d 155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
855 So. 2d 155, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12387, 2003 WL 21976142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alape-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.