Alape v. State
855 So. 2d 155, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12387, 2003 WL 21976142
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 20, 2003·No. No. 4D03-2446·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Keith Alape seeks review of an order that denied his rule 3.850 motion without prejudice to permit a proper filing. We find appellant’s sworn motion(s) and memorandum of law to state a legally sufficient claim that his plea was unlawfully induced. We reverse and remand for the trial court to consider the claim on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alape v. State, 855 So. 2d 155, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12387, 2003 WL 21976142 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
855 So. 2d 155 (Alape v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
LaFleur v. State
855 So. 2d 155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)