Alan Woods and Cara Woods v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company

818 F.2d 753, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7180
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJune 5, 1987
Docket84-7510
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 818 F.2d 753 (Alan Woods and Cara Woods v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alan Woods and Cara Woods v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, 818 F.2d 753, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7180 (11th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

*754 PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 967, 94 L.Ed.2d 1, this court’s order, filed September 19,1985 granting appellee’s motion for a ten percent penalty assessment pursuant to Alabama statute is VACATED. The opinion and judgment of this court affirming the judgment of the district court is REINSTATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Colvin v. Curtis
860 F. Supp. 1503 (M.D. Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
818 F.2d 753, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alan-woods-and-cara-woods-v-burlington-northern-railroad-company-ca11-1987.