Alan Uresti v. Joann Gutierrez

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 9, 2011·No. 04-10-00717-CV·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00717-CV

Alan URESTI, Appellant

v.

Joann GUTIERREZ, Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006-CI-09548 Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 9, 2011

DISMISSED

The clerk’s record was due on December 1, 2010, and has not been filed. On December

6, 2010, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record stating that appellant had failed to

pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, and appellant is

not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. On December 21, 2010, this court ordered

appellant to show cause in writing by January 3, 2011, why this appeal should not be dismissed

for want of prosecution. Appellant responded by filing a pro se motion requesting 04-10-00717-CV

reconsideration of the court’s show cause order; appellant asserts he is indigent, and requests that

the clerk’s record and reporter’s record be filed in this court without the need for payment. On

January 7, 2011, a certified copy of the trial court’s “Order Sustaining Contests to Affidavit of

Inability to Pay Costs on Appeal Filed by Alan Uresti and Ordering Alan Uresti to Pay All Costs

of Appeal” was filed in this court. Because the record shows the appellant is not indigent and

has failed to pay for preparation of the clerk’s record, the appeal is dismissed for want of

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alan Uresti v. Joann Gutierrez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Alan Uresti v. Joann Gutierrez (Alan Uresti v. Joann Gutierrez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.