Alan M. Grochal, Trustee for Instantwhip-Washington, D.C. v. Aeration Processes, Inc., D/B/A Instantwhip Foods, Inc.
This text of 812 F.2d 745 (Alan M. Grochal, Trustee for Instantwhip-Washington, D.C. v. Aeration Processes, Inc., D/B/A Instantwhip Foods, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
On August 19, 1986, the court issued a judgment and opinion herein that reversed the judgment of the district court and remanded the case. On remand the district court learned and informed this court that the parties had fully settled their controversy by agreement of June 9, 1986. Now the attorneys of record have responded to this court’s order of January 28, 1987 to show cause why the court’s judgment and opinion of August 19, 1986 should not be vacated and sanctions applied. As there is no objection to this order to vacate, and as Article III of the Constitution limits the court’s jurisdiction to cases and controversies, it is
ORDERED by the court that this court’s mandate issued on September 24, 1986 is hereby recalled, and it is
FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this court’s judgment and opinion of August 19, 1986 in this docket be and are hereby vacated.
Sanctions against the attorneys of record will be governed by future orders.
The Clerk is directed to issue a certified copy of this order to the district court in lieu of formal mandate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
812 F.2d 745, 259 U.S. App. D.C. 29, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 17690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alan-m-grochal-trustee-for-instantwhip-washington-dc-v-aeration-cadc-1987.