Alan Investors Corp. v. Devenco Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alan Investors Corp. v. Devenco Inc.

51 A.D.2d 565, 378 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10832

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 565 (Alan Investors Corp. v. Devenco Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alan Investors Corp. v. Devenco Inc., 51 A.D.2d 565, 378 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for rent, plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 9, 1975, which (a) granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and (b) directed defendant to retender to plaintiffs its check in the amount of $18,000, pursuant to a cancellation penalty contained in the lease, and (2) the judgment entered thereon on July 17, 1975. Judgment and order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion denied) The documents in this case present a question of fact as to whether the new agreement was intended to incorporate the right to cancel which was contained in the original lease. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for rent, plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 9, 1975, which (a) granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and (b) directed defendant to retender to plaintiffs its check in the amount of $18,000, pursuant to a cancellation penalty contained in the lease, and (2) the judgment entered thereon on July 17, 1975. Judgment and order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion denied) The documents in this case present a question of fact as to whether the new agreement was intended to incorporate the right to cancel which was contained in the original lease. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 565, 378 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alan-investors-corp-v-devenco-inc-nyappdiv-1976.