Alan Doering v. Bill Hollenbeck

691 F. App'x 302
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 30, 2017
Docket16-3880
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 691 F. App'x 302 (Alan Doering v. Bill Hollenbeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alan Doering v. Bill Hollenbeck, 691 F. App'x 302 (8th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Alan Lewis Doering appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising from his pretrial detention at the Sebastian County Detention Center. Upon de novo review of the record, we find no basis for overturning the district court’s disposition of Mr. Doering’s claims. See Cullor v. Baldwin, 830 F.3d 830, 836 (8th Cir. 2016) (in considering summary judgment, viewing record in light most favorable to non-moving party and drawing all reasonable inferences from it in his favor). The judgment of the district court is affirmed, but we amend the dismissal of the claims that the district court found had not been administratively exhausted, to be without prejudice. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

, The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Mark E, Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Calhoun v. Baldwin
S.D. Ohio, 2020

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
691 F. App'x 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alan-doering-v-bill-hollenbeck-ca8-2017.