ALAN B. CURTIS v. JEANINE R. SAXTON and SHIRLEEN D. PENDLETON
This text of ALAN B. CURTIS v. JEANINE R. SAXTON and SHIRLEEN D. PENDLETON (ALAN B. CURTIS v. JEANINE R. SAXTON and SHIRLEEN D. PENDLETON) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
ALAN B. CURTIS, Appellant,
v.
JEANINE R. SAXTON and SHILEEN D. PENDLETON, Appellees.
No. 4D19-3402
[May 14, 2020]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Janet Carney Croom, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312018CA000513.
Alan B. Curtis, Graceville, pro se.
Jeanine R. Saxton and Shileen D. Pendleton, Vine Grove, Kentucky, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
MAY, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ALAN B. CURTIS v. JEANINE R. SAXTON and SHIRLEEN D. PENDLETON, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alan-b-curtis-v-jeanine-r-saxton-and-shirleen-d-pendleton-fladistctapp-2020.