Alamo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Alamo v. State

686 So. 2d 17, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6760, 1996 WL 347074

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 26, 1996

DocketNo. 96-00127

StatusPublished

This text of 686 So. 2d 17 (Alamo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alamo v. State, 686 So. 2d 17, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6760, 1996 WL 347074 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Miriam Alamo challenges the denial of her motion to correct illegal sentence brought under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), alleging she is entitled to credit pursuant to State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla.1989). The trial court denied the motion without attaching any documentation which would refute the issue raised by Alamo.

Accordingly we reverse. On remand, should the trial court again deny the motion, it must attach portions of the record which refute Alamo’s claim. See Becton v. State, 668 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Reversed and remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and BLUE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI