Alam v. Holder
This text of 448 F. App'x 363 (Alam v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Syed Said Alam, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen and rescind his in absentia deportation order. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on Alam’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b) (2011). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Alam, (B.I.A. Mar. 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 F. App'x 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alam-v-holder-ca4-2011.