Aladdin Development & Construction Co. v. Fleet Bank of New York, N. A.

262 A.D.2d 999, 691 N.Y.S.2d 371, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7190

This text of 262 A.D.2d 999 (Aladdin Development & Construction Co. v. Fleet Bank of New York, N. A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aladdin Development & Construction Co. v. Fleet Bank of New York, N. A., 262 A.D.2d 999, 691 N.Y.S.2d 371, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7190 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Howe, J.). We add only that the issue of fact whether plaintiff had constructive possession of the checks precludes summary judgment on both the conversion and the breach of contract causes of action (see, State of New York v Barclays Bank, 76 NY2d 533, 540-541). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Howe, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Barclays Bank of New York, N. A.
563 N.E.2d 11 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D.2d 999, 691 N.Y.S.2d 371, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aladdin-development-construction-co-v-fleet-bank-of-new-york-n-a-nyappdiv-1999.