Alabre v. Clemens

328 F. App'x 56
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJuly 1, 2009
DocketNo. 08-3651-cv
StatusPublished

This text of 328 F. App'x 56 (Alabre v. Clemens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alabre v. Clemens, 328 F. App'x 56 (2d Cir. 2009).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant Jean Alabre (“Ala-bre”) appeals from a June 19, 2008 judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Nevas, J.). The district court granted the summary judgment motion of Defendants-Appellees Brian Clemens (“Clemens”), Lawrence Callahan (“Callahan”), and the Judicial Branch of the State of Connecticut (“Judicial Branch”) and dismissed Alabre’s claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution and Connecticut law. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history and issues on appeal.

We AFFIRM for substantially the same the reasons stated by the district court in its thoughtful opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
328 F. App'x 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alabre-v-clemens-ca2-2009.