Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co. v. McAfee

71 Miss. 70
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1893
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 71 Miss. 70 (Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co. v. McAfee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co. v. McAfee, 71 Miss. 70 (Mich. 1893).

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

On the testimony of the plaintiff himself the verdict should have been for the defendant. He shows that he fell among thieves, and, in being robbed, was pushed off the car and hurt. He had made an arrangement with the crew in charge of the train to work his way to Brandon, and suffered wrong at their hands, but he has no claim on the railway company for the wrong resulting from the disastrous consequences of his own venture. The people who wronged him were not serving the company in what they did. The whole thing was an unauthorized arrangement to suit the views of the participants, and not to serve the company, and it is not responsible for what happened by design- or accident.

The first instruction for plaintiff is wrong, as applied to this case. It is true that even a trespasser on a train must not be knocked off by the servant of the company engaged about his master’s business in putting him off', but that rule has no application here, where the plaintiff suffered injury from his own comrades, engaged not in serving the railway company or about its business, but illegally engaged in a scheme of their own, in violation of duty to the company, participated in by the plaintiff. He has no claim against the company he wronged by attempting to ride on its train without paying fare, and must look for redress for the wrong done him to the person who did it.

The peremptory instruction asked by the defendant might well have been given.

Reversed, and remanded for a neio trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Illinois Cent. R. v. Green
94 So. 793 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1922)
Louisville & N. R. v. Corlander
91 So. 699 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1922)
American Ry. Exp. Co. v. Wright
91 So. 342 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1922)
Hines v. Cole
85 So. 199 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1920)
Grahn v. International & Great Northern Railroad
100 Tex. 27 (Texas Supreme Court, 1906)
Grahn v. I. G.N.R.R. Co.
93 S.W. 104 (Texas Supreme Court, 1906)
McNeill v. Railroad Co.
67 L.R.A. 227 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1904)
Illinois Central Railroad v. Latham
72 Miss. 32 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 Miss. 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alabama-vicksburg-railway-co-v-mcafee-miss-1893.