Alabama v. Finch
This text of 396 U.S. 552 (Alabama v. Finch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
90 S.Ct. 747
24 L.Ed.2d 744
State of ALABAMA, plaintiff,
v.
Robert FINCH, as Secretary of the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, and John N. Mitchell, as Attorney General of the United States.
No. 38, Original.
Supreme Court of the United States
February 2, 1970
Albert P. Brewer, Governor of Alabama, Daniel J. Meador and Maury D. Smith, on the motion.
On motion for leave to file bill of complaint.
PER CURIAM.
On Mitchell, as Attorney General of the United States, as defendants.
The alleged emergent nature of the claims for relief led the Court to give expedited consideration to the motion and proffered complaint and, having examined the complaint, we conclude it fails to state a claim against either of the defendants warranting the exercise of the original jurisdiction of this Court.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to file the said complaint is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
396 U.S. 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alabama-v-finch-scotus-1969.