Alabama State Bar Ex Rel. Steiner v. Aderholt

218 So. 2d 149, 283 Ala. 436, 1969 Ala. LEXIS 1212
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 23, 1969
Docket3 Div. 294
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 218 So. 2d 149 (Alabama State Bar Ex Rel. Steiner v. Aderholt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alabama State Bar Ex Rel. Steiner v. Aderholt, 218 So. 2d 149, 283 Ala. 436, 1969 Ala. LEXIS 1212 (Ala. 1969).

Opinion

COLEMAN, Justice.

The Alabama State Bar, acting by and through its officers, appeals from a judgment prohibiting appellant from further prosecuting any charges against appellee for any official actions taken on his part as Judge of the Winston County Court of Law and Equity.

The Bar Association commenced proceedings against appellee to discipline or disbar him for acts done by him in his capacity as judge. In all material respects, the charges are the same as the charges brought against the judge in Alabama State Bar ex rel. Steiner v. Moore, 282 Ala. 562, 213 So.2d 404. In the instant case, the trial court expressed the opinion that what was said in Moore would apply here. We agree.

In Moore, this court said:

“The issue upon which a disposition of this appeal rests is whether a judge may be disciplined or disbarred by the Board of Bar Commissioners of the State of Alabama during the term in which he is holding office for acts performed in a judicial capacity. Another aspect of the issue is whether a judge, while serving as such, is a member of the State Bar. We believe that better reasoned decisions of courts of other jurisdictions adhere to the principle that the Bar cannot remove or discipline a judge for conduct as such judge acting in his judicial capacity. (Citations Omitted), nor can the Bar remove or discipline a judge where the Constitution provides the exclusive method of removal. (Citations Omitted)” (282 Ala. at page 564, 213 So.2d at page 406)

On authority of Moore, the judgment here appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and BLOODWORTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Bar of Nevada v. Claiborne
756 P.2d 464 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1988)
Simpson v. Alabama State Bar
311 So. 2d 307 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1975)
Alabama State Bar v. Watson
272 So. 2d 240 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1972)
Alabama State Bar v. Simpson
272 So. 2d 245 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1972)
In Re Alonzo
223 So. 2d 585 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 So. 2d 149, 283 Ala. 436, 1969 Ala. LEXIS 1212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alabama-state-bar-ex-rel-steiner-v-aderholt-ala-1969.