Alabama Public Service Commission v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Alabama Public Service Commission v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

94 So. 472, 208 Ala. 243, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 520

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedOctober 12, 1922

Docket3 Div. 572.

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 94 So. 472 (Alabama Public Service Commission v. Western Union Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alabama Public Service Commission v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 94 So. 472, 208 Ala. 243, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 520 (Ala. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed on authority of State of Alabama v. Western Union Telegraph Co., ante, p. 228, 94 South. 466.

[1,2] The valid orders of a public service commission will be enforced in the courts, and orders not authorized by law are unenforceable. Miss. R. Com. v. M. & O., 244 U. S. 388, 37 Sup. Ct. 602, 61 L. Ed. 1216; Interstate Comm. Com. v. L. & N., 227 U. S. 88, 33 Sup. Ct. 185, 57 L. Ed. 431, 433; Interstate Comm. Com. v. Nor. Pac., 222 U. S. 541, 32 Sup. Ct. 108, 56 L. Ed. 308; Miss. R. Com. v. I. C., 203 U. S. 335, 27 Sup. Ct. 90, 51 L. Ed. 209. The final test of validity or invalidity of the order is whether, when all the circumstances that are relevant and material to samo as duly presented are considered, the order is reasonable or unreasonable. R. R. Com. v. Ala. North., 182 Ala. 357, 364, 62 South. 749; R. R. Com. of Ala. v. A. G. S., 185 Ala. 354, 64 South. 13, L. R. A. 1915D, 98; Miss. R. Com. v. M. & O., 244 U. S. 388, 37 Sup. Ct. 602, 61 L. Ed. 1216.

In the finding of the state court, when the conclusion of law and finding of facts are intermingled so as. to make it necessary in order to pass npon the question, the Supreme Court of the United States will analyze the facts. Jones Nat. Bank v. Yates, 240 U. S. 541, 552, 553, 36 Sup. Ct. 429, 60 L. Ed. 788; Nor. Pac. v. North Dakota, 236 U. S. 585, 593, 35 Sup. Ct. 429, 59 L. Ed. 735, L. R. A. 1917F, 1148, Ann. Cas. 1916A, 1; Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U. S. 312, 42 Sup. Ct. 124, 66 L. Ed. 254.

[3] The fact that the Western Union Telegraph Company did not apply to the Alabama Public Service Commission for vacation of flic order or for injunctive relief therefrom, within a given time from the rendition of the orden- of April 30, 1920, did not subject it to obedience to an order that is unreasonable and unjust under the circumstances and under the guaranties of organic law. The order may not be enforced.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCDELLAN and SOMERVILLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMAS, J.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed on authority of State of Alabama v. Western Union Telegraph Co., ante, p. 228, 94 South. 466.

[1,2] The valid orders of a public service commission will be enforced in the courts, and orders not authorized by law are unenforceable. Miss. R. Com. v. M. & O., 244 U. S. 388, 37 Sup. Ct. 602, 61 L. Ed. 1216; Interstate Comm. Com. v. L. & N., 227 U. S. 88, 33 Sup. Ct. 185, 57 L. Ed. 431, 433; Interstate Comm. Com. v. Nor. Pac., 222 U. S. 541, 32 Sup. Ct. 108, 56 L. Ed. 308; Miss. R. Com. v. I. C., 203 U. S. 335, 27 Sup. Ct. 90, 51 L. Ed. 209. The final test of validity or invalidity of the order is whether, when all the circumstances that are relevant and material to samo as duly presented are considered, the order is reasonable or unreasonable. R. R. Com. v. Ala. North., 182 Ala. 357, 364, 62 South. 749; R. R. Com. of Ala. v. A. G. S., 185 Ala. 354, 64 South. 13, L. R. A. 1915D, 98; Miss. R. Com. v. M. & O., 244 U. S. 388, 37 Sup. Ct. 602, 61 L. Ed. 1216.

In the finding of the state court, when the conclusion of law and finding of facts are intermingled so as. to make it necessary in order to pass npon the question, the Supreme Court of the United States will analyze the facts. Jones Nat. Bank v. Yates, 240 U. S. 541, 552, 553, 36 Sup. Ct. 429, 60 L. Ed. 788; Nor. Pac. v. North Dakota, 236 U. S. 585, 593, 35 Sup. Ct. 429, 59 L. Ed. 735, L. R. A. 1917F, 1148, Ann. Cas. 1916A, 1; Traux v. Corrigan, 257 U. S. 312, 42 Sup. Ct. 124, 66 L. Ed. 254.

[3] The fact that the Western Union Telegraph Company did not apply to the Alabama Public Service Commission for vacation of flic order or for injunctive relief therefrom, within a given time from the rendition of the orden- of April 30, 1920, did not subject it to obedience to an order that is unreasonable and unjust under the circumstances and under the guaranties of organic law. The order may not be enforced.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCDELLAN and SOMERVILLE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 So. 472, 208 Ala. 243, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alabama-public-service-commission-v-western-union-telegraph-co-ala-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack