Alabama Power Co. v. Talmadge
259 U.S. 575, 42 S. Ct. 463, 66 L. Ed. 1071, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2501
Opinion
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alabama Power Co. v. Talmadge, 259 U.S. 575, 42 S. Ct. 463, 66 L. Ed. 1071, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2501 (1922).
259 U.S. 575 (Alabama Power Co. v. Talmadge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chilton Butane Gas, Inc. v. Marcus
267 So. 2d 140 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1972)
State v. Keiter
394 S.W.2d 399 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1965)
Lincoln Mills v. Textile Workers Union, CIO, Local No. 230+
89 So. 2d 88 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)
Hawn v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. (Two Cases)
198 F.2d 800 (Third Circuit, 1952)
State v. Hansen
181 P.2d 192 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1947)
Gucciardi v. Chisholm
145 F.2d 514 (Second Circuit, 1944)
Grasso v. Lorentzen
56 F. Supp. 51 (S.D. New York, 1944)
State v. James
145 S.W.2d 783 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1940)
Simon v. United States
62 F.2d 13 (Ninth Circuit, 1932)
Schneider v. Commonwealth
22 S.W.2d 587 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1929)
United States v. All Buildings
28 F.2d 774 (D. Kansas, 1928)