Alabama Power Co. v. Capps
This text of 160 So. 685 (Alabama Power Co. v. Capps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause was here on former appeal. See Alabama Power Co. v. Capps, 226 Ala. 362, 147 So. 156.
On second trial the court gave the affirmative charge, with hypothesis, for defendant.
The bill of exceptions does not purport to set out all the evidence; hence, this ruling is not subject to review. Sanders v. Edmonds, 98 Ala. 157, 13 So. 505; Sanders v. Steen, 128 Ala. 633, 29 So. 586; Clardy v. Walker, 132 Ala. 264, 31 So. 78; Stafford v. Jones, 224 Ala. 583, 141 So. 246; Federal Intermediate Credit Bank of New Orleans v. Faulk, 228 Ala. 621, 154 So. 606.
If error intervened in other rulings presented, injury does not affirmatively appear.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 So. 685, 230 Ala. 263, 1935 Ala. LEXIS 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alabama-power-co-v-capps-ala-1935.