Alabama Power Co. v. Capps

160 So. 685, 230 Ala. 263, 1935 Ala. LEXIS 137
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 11, 1935
Docket4 Div. 806.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 160 So. 685 (Alabama Power Co. v. Capps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alabama Power Co. v. Capps, 160 So. 685, 230 Ala. 263, 1935 Ala. LEXIS 137 (Ala. 1935).

Opinion

BOULDIN, Justice.

This cause was here on former appeal. See Alabama Power Co. v. Capps, 226 Ala. 362, 147 So. 156.

On second trial the court gave the affirmative charge, with hypothesis, for defendant.

The bill of exceptions does not purport to set out all the evidence; hence, this ruling is not subject to review. Sanders v. Edmonds, 98 Ala. 157, 13 So. 505; Sanders v. Steen, 128 Ala. 633, 29 So. 586; Clardy v. Walker, 132 Ala. 264, 31 So. 78; Stafford v. Jones, 224 Ala. 583, 141 So. 246; Federal Intermediate Credit Bank of New Orleans v. Faulk, 228 Ala. 621, 154 So. 606.

If error intervened in other rulings presented, injury does not affirmatively appear.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alabama Power Co. v. Byars
181 So. 270 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1938)
Byars v. Alabama Power Co.
172 So. 621 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 So. 685, 230 Ala. 263, 1935 Ala. LEXIS 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alabama-power-co-v-capps-ala-1935.