Alabama National Life Ins. Co. v. Bozeman

168 So. 2d 488, 42 Ala. App. 486, 1964 Ala. App. LEXIS 240
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 27, 1964
Docket6 Div. 43
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 168 So. 2d 488 (Alabama National Life Ins. Co. v. Bozeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alabama National Life Ins. Co. v. Bozeman, 168 So. 2d 488, 42 Ala. App. 486, 1964 Ala. App. LEXIS 240 (Ala. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

Before submission, counsel for appellee filed a motion to dismiss this appeal and to affirm the judgment on the grounds:

(1) There is no certificate that a copy of the assignments of error has been served upon appellee;
(2) No assignment of error was served upon appellee or his counsel.

In Board of Education of Colbert County v. Mitchell, 270 Ala. 594, 121 So.2d 103, the court said:

“An assignment of error is an instrument of appellate pleading. It should be available to one’s opponent, and where, as here, a copy of the assignments of error was not served on appellee and the brief of appellant does not contain an assignment either literally or by a fair paraphrase, the opponent is put in the position of not knowing whether an assignment of error has been made and, if so, of what it consists.”

The record contains assignments of error, but there is no certificate that a copy of the assignments of error had been served on appellee as required by amended Supreme Court Rule 1.

The assignment of error in the brief is not an exact copy or a fair paraphrase of the assignments set out in the transcript.

We also note that the matters argued in the brief do not disclose newly discovered evidence as a matter of law, and are not such as could be classified as newly discovered evidence.

[487]*487The motion is well taken and must be granted. Board of Education of Colbert Co. v. Mitchell, supra; Alabama Terminix Company, Inc. v. Lewey, 273 Ala. 272, 138 So.2d 718.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conley v. Krekelberg
179 So. 2d 775 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 So. 2d 488, 42 Ala. App. 486, 1964 Ala. App. LEXIS 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alabama-national-life-ins-co-v-bozeman-alactapp-1964.