Alabama Midland Railway Co. v. Swindell & Co.

45 S.E. 264, 117 Ga. 883, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 378
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 29, 1903·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Cobb, J.

1. The motion to dismiss the writ of error must be overruled. Under the ruling in Cooper v. State, 103 Ga. 405, which was followed in Medlock v. Haslett, 115 Ga. 428, the act of November 21,1901 (Acts 1901, p. 94) had the effect to constitute the then existing city court of Bainbridge a constitutional city court.

2. The evidence discloses a case very similar to that which was contained in the record in the case of Southern Railway Co. v. Pace, 114 Ga. 712. That decision was followed in the case of Southern Railway Co. v. Horine, 115 Ga. 664. Under these rulings, the evidence in the present case did not authorize a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and the judge should have granted a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alabama Midland Railway Co. v. Swindell & Co., 45 S.E. 264, 117 Ga. 883, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 378 (Ga. 1903).

45 S.E. 264 (Alabama Midland Railway Co. v. Swindell & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Southern Railway Co. v. Smith
95 S.E. 328 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. McElmurray Bros.
77 S.E. 2 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Southern Railway Co. v. Elliott
59 S.E. 786 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Southern Railway Co. v. Herrington
57 S.E. 694 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Fordham v. Ehrlich & Brother
45 S.E. 264 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)