Alabama Midland Railway Co. v. Swindell & Co.
Opinion
2. The evidence discloses a case very similar to that which was contained in the record in the case of Southern Railway Co. v. Pace, 114 Ga. 712. That decision was followed in the case of Southern Railway Co. v. Horine, 115 Ga. 664. Under these rulings, the evidence in the present case did not authorize a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and the judge should have granted a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
45 S.E. 264 (Alabama Midland Railway Co. v. Swindell & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.