Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Wallace

94 S.E. 78, 21 Ga. App. 80, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 438
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 31, 1917
Docket8351
StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 78 (Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Wallace, 94 S.E. 78, 21 Ga. App. 80, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 438 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. Upon the trial of a suit against a railroad company for damages for the killing of a dog by the running of its locomotives or cars or other machinery, proof of such killing raises a presumption of [81]*81negligence against the company. Seaboard Air-Line Ry. v. McDonald, 19 Ga. App. 627 (91 S. E. 1053).

Decided October 31, 1917. Appeal; from Dade superior court — Judge Fite. December 27, 1916. Payne & Hale, for plaintiff in error.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. McDonald
91 S.E. 1053 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 78, 21 Ga. App. 80, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alabama-great-southern-railroad-v-wallace-gactapp-1917.