Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Wallace
This text of 94 S.E. 78 (Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Upon the trial of a suit against a railroad company for damages for the killing of a dog by the running of its locomotives or cars or other machinery, proof of such killing raises a presumption of [81]*81negligence against the company. Seaboard Air-Line Ry. v. McDonald, 19 Ga. App. 627 (91 S. E. 1053).
2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 S.E. 78, 21 Ga. App. 80, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alabama-great-southern-railroad-v-wallace-gactapp-1917.