Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Wallace

94 S.E. 78, 21 Ga. App. 80, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 438
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 31, 1917·No. 8351·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. Upon the trial of a suit against a railroad company for damages for the killing of a dog by the running of its locomotives or cars or other machinery, proof of such killing raises a presumption of [81]*81negligence against the company. Seaboard Air-Line Ry. v. McDonald, 19 Ga. App. 627 (91 S. E. 1053).

Decided October 31, 1917. Appeal; from Dade superior court — Judge Fite. December 27, 1916. Payne & Hale, for plaintiff in error.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Wallace, 94 S.E. 78, 21 Ga. App. 80, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 438 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

94 S.E. 78 (Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. McDonald
91 S.E. 1053 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)