Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Wallace
94 S.E. 78, 21 Ga. App. 80, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 438
Opinion
1. Upon the trial of a suit against a railroad company for damages for the killing of a dog by the running of its locomotives or cars or other machinery, proof of such killing raises a presumption of [81]*81negligence against the company. Seaboard Air-Line Ry. v. McDonald, 19 Ga. App. 627 (91 S. E. 1053).
2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Wallace, 94 S.E. 78, 21 Ga. App. 80, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 438 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
94 S.E. 78 (Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. McDonald
91 S.E. 1053 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)