Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Hardy

Supreme Court of Georgia

Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Hardy

69 S.E. 1081, 135 Ga. 606, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 20

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Hardy. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Ga. 238 →

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 11, 1911·Published

Opinion

Holden, J.

Counsel for the plaintiff in error in their brief do not complain that any error was committed except in the overruling of the motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence and without evidence to support it, and refer to no other grounds of the motion. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and the judgment overruling- the motion for a new trial will not be reversed. • .

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holden, J.

Counsel for the plaintiff in error in their brief do not complain that any error was committed except in the overruling of the motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence and without evidence to support it, and refer to no other grounds of the motion. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and the judgment overruling- the motion for a new trial will not be reversed. • .

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J., absent.

Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Hardy, 69 S.E. 1081, 135 Ga. 606, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 20 (Ga. 1911).

Pincite

69 S.E. 1081 (Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Hardy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.