Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Brown

Supreme Court of Georgia

Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Brown

86 S.E. 1084, 144 Ga. 269, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 163

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 140 Ga. 792 →

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 12, 1915·Published

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. This case has been before the Supreme Court on two former occasions. 138 Ga. 328 (75 S. E. 330); 140 Ga. 792 (79 S. E. 1113, 35 Ann. Cas. (1915A.) 1159). The charge on the subject of the statutory presumption, which also contained certain instructions as to how the presumption might be rebutted, contains no error against the defendant.

2. The requests to charge did not accurately state correct principles of law applicable to the case, and were properly refused.

3. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict.

Judgment affirmed-.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

1. This case has been before the Supreme Court on two former occasions. 138 Ga. 328 (75 S. E. 330); 140 Ga. 792 (79 S. E. 1113, 35 Ann. Cas. (1915A.) 1159). The charge on the subject of the statutory presumption, which also contained certain instructions as to how the presumption might be rebutted, contains no error against the defendant.

2. The requests to charge did not accurately state correct principles of law applicable to the case, and were properly refused.

3. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict.

Judgment affirmed-.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, J., absent.

Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Brown, 86 S.E. 1084, 144 Ga. 269, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 163 (Ga. 1915).

Pincite

86 S.E. 1084 (Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

3. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict.

Related