Alabama Farmers Cooperative, Inc. v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Alabama Farmers Cooperative, Inc. v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP

911 So. 2d 703, 2005 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 173, 2005 WL 858075

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedApril 15, 2005

Docket2020454

StatusPublished

This text of 911 So. 2d 703 (Alabama Farmers Cooperative, Inc. v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alabama Farmers Cooperative, Inc. v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, 911 So. 2d 703, 2005 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 173, 2005 WL 858075 (Ala. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

[704]*704 On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

A portion of this court’s judgment of March 5, 2004, has been reversed, and the cause has been remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Alabama Farmers Coop., Inc., 911 So.2d 696 (Ala.2004). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed in part, as to the negligence claims, and reversed in part, as to the fraud claims, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

CRAWLEY, P.J., and THOMPSON, MURDOCK, and BRYAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[704]*704 On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

A portion of this court’s judgment of March 5, 2004, has been reversed, and the cause has been remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Alabama Farmers Coop., Inc., 911 So.2d 696 (Ala.2004). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed in part, as to the negligence claims, and reversed in part, as to the fraud claims, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

CRAWLEY, P.J., and THOMPSON, MURDOCK, and BRYAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

911 So. 2d 703, 2005 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 173, 2005 WL 858075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alabama-farmers-cooperative-inc-v-pricewaterhousecoopers-llp-alacivapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack